On Oct 14, 2006, at 8:26 AM, David Mann wrote: > On Oct 14, 2006, at 2:18 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >>> Great save! Of course, with film you'd have had a bigger frame to >>> start with ;)) >> >> Huh? If the nose was clipped on film, there would be no recovering >> anything. > > The edge of the film would be further than the edge of the sensor, so > there'd be no need to recover, assuming the same focal length was > used.
Yes, but if you STILL clipped the nose of the jet due to its speed across the sky, as what happened with John's image, you'd still have a clipped nose and you wouldn't have any ability to recover anything from it. Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
