1. They did leave FD bodies in production for a few years ( most likely sales fell off so it wasn't economically feasable) 2. I have said this over and over again - CANON USERS GOT A NEW AND IMPROVED MOUNT when EOS came out - THERE IS NO NEW AND IMPROVED MOUNT on the current pentax DSLR bodies. You are an Idiot if you cant understand this simple fundamental difference Between what happened with Canon and what happened with pentax DSLRS. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 8:29 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator survey,part Deaux Now in Digest mode to save bandwidth. ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: K1D aperture simulator survey, part Deaux > This is stupid enough to drop. > Anyone over 6 yrs old could easily understand what I implied > In the post. You are just aruing to argue. You need to post consice thoughts in a consice and understandable manner if you want to be understood. I can't be made responsible for misunderstanding your vague drivel. > Brilliant post, it just adds so much to the discussion. > Next time, try to post something meaningful, huh? You too. > FD/EOS is a stupid analogy because it's the WRONG > Analogy. Cant you understand the difference between > Incompatability and lack of support of something > That isnt incompatble? Obviously not or you wouldn't > Be going on and on about Canon FD/EOS mounts. It's a good analogy in that it highlites one company who completely screwed their user base by dropping support for millions of lenses. There was nothing to stop Canon from either making the EOS cameras adaptable to the FD lenses, or leaving a couple of FD mount bodies in production. Nothing except corporate greed, anyway. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
