Your assumption is maximum depth of field is what is Always needed when its not. With tilts and swings You can entire offset planes in focus with selective (minimal) DOF if needed. You cant do that with photoshop After the fact. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 8:05 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide Inet ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide Inet > If I am the "john" you are reffering to, I do use > Photoshop. Not sure which John you are talking about. > Photoshop can do perspective control with a loss in > Resolution but it cant do what tilts and swings > Do which is control plane of focus/DOF. With the smaller format, depth of field is generally easy enough to secure in architectural work. After that it becomes a question of compromise: Is the output from the smaller format camera good enough for the intended purpose? That is something that neither you, nor I, can answer for someone else. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
