WEL WELL WELL. You keep arguing against your Prior arguments just to argue again. You earlier Stated they need to sell new lenses. If the new Ones are so apealling with their own special features Like you are now claiming, They wouldn't need to degrade the old ones would They? Another BS post. Please stick you your old Post arguments without constantly changing your Position on every new post to argue my CONSISTANT Opinions and arguments. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 4:10 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The JCO survey ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: The JCO survey >I strongly disagree. They shouldn't be making new products > More apealling but simply disabling features on legacy > Products. They should be made more apealling on their > Own merits compared to what the legacy products were/are > Capable of. I think you may have missed a few appealing features on the new products. Autofocus and program/ shutter preferred AE come to mind, along with MTF transfer; there's probably more reasons. The legacy products pale by comparison, especially the ones that don't suppot things like Hyper program, auto focus, etc.... William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
