All well and good, and no contradiction to what I said. I wouldn't choose it for doing architecture, however. Between the rendering quality and the need to do rectilinear correction with PTLens, I'd find it a pain. ;-)
Godfrey On Oct 13, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > I've used 'em both. The 16-45 is better, but the 18-55 is still a > good > lens for the money as you say, and a nice snapshop lens. Well > worth the > price ... > >> I have found that the distortions shown by the DA 18-55 are easily >> corrected by using PT Lens, and the 18-55 is a really good >> performer for >> its price. But I am sure the 16-45 is a better lens. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
