J and K Messervy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's this lens like?  Any good?  It's not particularly wide,
but I've 
> found one that's affordable.
> 
> Would I be better off waiting for a 55?

Hi James,

It depends on what you are looking for...
The 90mm (the "normal" one, not the leaf shutter one) is the
only 67 lens I bought new. I was looking for a normal lens (I
already had the 55 and the 165 at the time) but I wasn't sure I
would have liked the close focusing ability of the 105 so I went
for the 90.
It is a great all-around wide-normal lens (in terms of field of
view it is closer to a 43mm on the 135 cameras, so if you are
looking for a wide lens it may be disappointing), very small
although not light for the size. The pictures are reasonably
sharp at all apertures (I've been told that for wide open
performance the 105mm is a bit better), definitely tack sharp
when stopped down from 4-5-6 to 16. Only flaw is a tiny bit of
distorsion when focusing quite close, but nothing really
annoying (I used it for architecture a couple of times and it
was not an issue).
Hope this helps.

Ciao,

Gianfranco

_

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to