Actually, there's two reasons they're getting in.

1. Lenses, flashes and accessories are quite profitable. And SLR users 
buy more of these.

2. They don't lose money on the cameras. Unlike many P&S cameras these 
days, which are break-even at best.

-Adam



P. J. Alling wrote:
> Obviously you haven't been reading the literature, or noticed that every 
> manufacture with the expertise and manufacturing capability is trying to 
> get into the DSLR business, if there weren't high profits, there 
> wouldn't be new entrants to the field.  There are also high costs so you 
> won't see any small players getting involved.  The fact that Sony, 
> Samsung, Panasonic, etc. are entering the field alone should tell you 
> that.  Just because the store and sales employee don't see much of it 
> doesn't mean it isn't there. 
> 
> I hate to say back in the good old days but what the hell.  When the 
> first wave of electronics began to replace mechanicals in SLRs in the 
> late 1970s, I was selling cameras, damn I was young then.  I made most 
> of my income from Prize Money, manufactures would pay prizes for selling 
> particular items, usually it was paid to the store, but the company I 
> worked for passed most of it on to the employee.  Cameras like the ME 
> and the Minolta XD which replaced a lot of precision mechanical parts 
> with electronics were quite profitable, based on the Prize Money paid 
> out and we sold boat loads of them.  I don't doubt that the same holds 
> true of DSLRs.
>  
> William Robb wrote:
> 
> 
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "P. J. Alling"
>>Subject: Re: The JCO survey
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>>I assume that as with most electronic equipment there's a 40 point
>>>profit margin built in initially.  That may have changed since I last
>>>had anything to do with a company that owned their entire pipeline 
>>>from
>>>production to sales but I doubt it.  The whole reason to concentrate 
>>>on
>>>DSLR's is that they aren't commodity items, like P&S cameras, which is
>>>where margins are razor thin.  Assuming 40% markup over cost I'd say
>>>they'll be making money when the price drops to $599-699. levels in
>>>about 6 months if they follow the model used in most of the 
>>>electronics
>>>industry these days.  By then most of the new R&D should be recovered
>>>and the cost basis will be lower as well.
>>>   
>>>
>>
>>When I was selling cameras, there was almost no profit at all in SLR 
>>cameras, from manufacturing right through to the seller.
>>I don't see how anything has changed that way in the last 20 years.
>>
>>William Robb 
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>
> 
> 
> 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to