mike wilson wrote: >> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: 2006/10/11 Wed AM 05:22:15 GMT >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: The JCO survey >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "J. C. O'Connell" >> Subject: RE: The JCO survey >> >> >>> False, mechanical can be more reliable >>> Than electronic in some sitations. It all depends on >>> Good engineering. Bad engineering is what causes >>> Problems, not necessarily whether its >>> Mechanical or electronic. >> Can be more reliable is not the same thing as is more reliable. >> I own three Pentax LX camera bodies. >> This is the best camera they made, apparently >> >> All three have needed service because of flakey metering components. >> Either the ISO resistor or the aperture simulator resistor has been >> faulty on all three of my cameras. >> On one of them, this has been a multiple repair issue. >> Can be more reliable? >> > <whisper> > Those are electronic components... > </whisper> >
Actually, they're electromechanical components. And the problems with them are typically mechanical. -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
