I don't care what you think, its what I think. How many K/M lenses do you have or had? If you don't have that many its not a big Deal but for me it is because I have a whole Bunch and I really like them. I don't want them Disabled in any way by a dumb body. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Savage Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 12:26 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: Stakeout Who's making un-warranted personal attacks now John? What YOU seem to be unable to comprehend is that people on this list understand perfectly well what you saying. It's just not a deal breaker and as HUGE an issue as you make it out to be. K/M lenses still focus light onto the sensor (which IMHO is a lenses most important feature), and many people here still use them to take great pictures. Dave At 11:59 AM 11/10/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote: >But why do you claim that the GB is "not a problem" >With KM? see my point? There is no need to give up >The same AE that LX had with ALL pentax K lenses ever >Made. Your "we have DA/FA" makes no sense, what you >Have is brain damage if you cant understand my point >on this. Just because they put out some new ones is >no reason to disable the old ones without good cause >and I don't believe there is one. >jco > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Paul Stenquist >Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:27 PM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: Stakeout > >That was then. This is now. We have DA and FA lenses. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
