Testing error? Seem anti shake should be based On camera movement, not aperure. F stop has nothing To do with image stabilization corrections, if it Does in the camera that would be a mistake. Sure your Not just trying to knock the K/M for no reason. It also seems like something not easy to test scientifically Because you would need repeatable shake and same Focal lengths and optical qualities of the lenses to Be sure. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Maas Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:55 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K100D Anti-shake J. C. O'Connell wrote: > Someone commented the Anti shake in the K100d works > Better with "A" than with KM" lenses. W H Y ? > I do not understand how that could be true as the > Camera shouldn't be handling them differently. > Curious. > JCO > I'm baffled as well, unless it takes absolute aperture into account somehow. But I'm getting 1.5-2 stops from K/M glass and 2-3 stops from A and F glass on my K100D. -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
