Perry Pellechia wrote: > The real question is how much would you be willing to pay extra for a > camera that had the feature. If it added less than $100 to the cost > and did not effect other features that I want, i.e., SR and SS motor > lenses, then I would want it. I am not sure I would pay much more > than $100 for full K/M support. I am sure the threshold would be > different for others that have either a lot of K/M lens or had none. > > Perry.
I would save _much_ more than $100 in unbought lenses. (Which I'm not going to buy anyway, Pentax, in case you are listening) So it's worth much more than that to me. Count me in. > > On 10/9/06, Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>On the offhand chance that Pentax peeks at this list, >>I propose the following question: >> >>How many people here would consider an aperature >>simulator permitting (for K,M, and all other lenses with >>aperature rings) CW metering, open aperature metering >>in manual and AV modes a _highly_ desirable feature on >>the K1D? >> >>Put my name as the first on the list. >> >> >>-Lon >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
