Maybe three and a half. Paul On Oct 8, 2006, at 11:50 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
>> There are at least three people who get emotional about this. The >> rest of us don't give a damn. > > Three huh? > > Kenneth Waller > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: k10d and manual-aperture lenses? > > >> There are at least three people who get emotional about this. The >> rest of us don't give a damn. >> Paul >> On Oct 8, 2006, at 8:42 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: >> >>> Just because we're relatively quite about it doesn't mean that were >>> happy about it not being there. Especially since it seems to be a >>> purely marketing decision. >>> >>> John Forbes wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:58:38 +0100, J. C. O'Connell >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I want the feature very much and I am >>>>> Sure there are millions of lens owners that do to. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Really? >>>> >>>> Rubbish! >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler. >>> >>> --Albert Einstein >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
