On 10/6/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is only true with transparency film and presupposes that you > understand how the film and processing work. You have no control > other than focus and exposure. The film and processing are a constant.
I of course undersstand all that :-). But don't forget my initial point was shotting jpeg which is essentially an irreversible compression vs shooting RAW which leave everyting for the later post processing. I do not shoot everything in RAW and I do not like to post process everything I shoot. Alos, I like to print which I used to do with film. I do not know how much percent of the shots you guys print, but in my case, unless family demand to see it in porint, I usually print very little. In fact, all I print used to be those shot in RAW. But that's besides the point. I was hoping you understood my point of shooting jpeg vs RAW stemmed from the in-camera RAW. Too much attention to my analogy to the film shooting. In any case, it's not important as to argue about this. Ken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
