It was the least expensive of all the Pentax 135 K-mount lenses. Some 
of the elements aren't multi-coated. The supply of these lenses exceeds 
the demand, so they are not worth a lot. Others have reported getting 
good results with the lens as well, but it's only forth around $50 US. 
I'd start the auction at $30 tops. Or I'd keep the lens.
Paul
On Oct 5, 2006, at 6:35 AM, J and K Messervy wrote:

> What's wrong with the Takumar bayonet lens?  From using it, I reckon 
> it's a
> great piece of glass.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 8:10 PM
> Subject: Re: What's an LX worth?
>
>
>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>>> If your 135/2.5 is the SmC Takumar screwmount (either
>>> of the two varieties available), I'd start it at $125. If it's an
>>> earlier screwmount, I'd start it at $60.
>>
>> As it is the Takumar Bayonet, great demand may not be there, I am
>> afraid. The LX however... :-)
>>
>> I suggest that you do a search on eBay for completed listings for
>> these items to get an idea of prices.
>>
>> Good luck!
>>
>> Kostas
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to