You're right of course Adam - brain fade on my part!  I was thinking of the 
SeaFire, of course.

John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: GESO - Spitfire 70th Anniversary


> The Hawker Sea Fury is utterly unrelated to the Spit. It's somwhat of a
> development of the Tempest, but is likely related more closely to the
> FW190 than anything else (The close-shrouded radial design was borrowed
> from the Focke-Wulf, and that very nearly defined the airframe design,
> only the wings came from the Tempest).
>
> -Adam
>
>
> John Coyle wrote:
>> I remember reading about that at the time, and, IIRC, the victories were
>> ascribed to the superior manoeuvrability of the Sea Furies (which, of
>> course, were late versions of the Spitfire adapted for carrier work). 
>> This
>> was the same reason that the Gladiators which defended Malta against the
>> Forze Aerea were able to survive as long as they did.
>>
>> John Coyle
>> Brisbane, Australia
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 1:35 AM
>> Subject: Re: GESO - Spitfire 70th Anniversary
>> <SNIP>>
>>> Heck, there was a case in the Korean War where 8 MiG-15's jumped 4 Sea
>>> Furies, losing 1 MiG, 2 damaged MiG's, and a possible 2nd kill. The Sea
>>> Furies were undamaged.
>>>
>>> -Adam
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to