Juan Buhler wrote:
> 
> Yes, good catch Ann with the date.
> 
> They are interesting as a record of the time, as any snapshot of the
> sort is. But otherwise, they are not very good. To me they are
> interesting because those are the very streets where I shoot every
> week.
> 
> They are taken with "special long roll cameras", according to the
> site--probably some sort of movie camera I'd guess. Also this i a
> street photographer, in the sense of a guy who takes your picture in
> the street and then sells it to you for 50 cents. He wasn't going for
> art.
> 
> j
> 
THey become strong to me as a group because they bring back
what I observed
in NY in those days after the shooting.  No matter how
little intentional
art was involved, or how poor the exposures were, as a group
they deserve
some attention as a piece of history.

ann 

  

 




> On 10/1/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I missed the date. That makes them more important. But they're either
> > very bad scans or grossly underexposed. I would say they're
> > thematically interesting if not photographically worthy.
> > I'd like to take another look. I wish people wouldn't clip the url.
> > Paul
> > On Oct 1, 2006, at 10:20 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> >
> > > Bob Shell wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Oct 1, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I hate this sort of crap--photographers (especially
> > >>> sports, it seems) just dumping the contents of their
> > >>> memory cards on the web, totally unedited.
> > >>
> > >> Rick, those were taken in the 1960s!  Hardly memory card dumping!!
> > >>
> > >> Personally, I thought they were great.
> > >>
> > >> Bob
> > >>
> > >  Me too, Bob
> > >
> > >  I was wondering if there were specific dates for them -
> > > November-December 1963 is
> > >  bone chilling to me.  Some of the faces seemed to indicate
> > > a knowledge and reaction to
> > >  the fateful day.
> > >
> > >  These were a bit tedious to load - ain't got the new
> > > connection yet - can't wait to go back.
> > >
> > >  Thanks, Lasse, for posting them
> > >
> > > ann
> > >
> > > --
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> 
> --
> Juan Buhler - http://www.jbuhler.com
> photoblog: http://photoblog.jbuhler.com
> a book: http://www.jbuhler.com/book.html
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to