Rob...I'm totally with you on this. Using a dial on a camera body to control the aperture is nuts to me. I don't see it as an advantage either. To me it seems cumbersome and ridiculous.
-Brendan --- Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 17/09/06, Paul Stenquist > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But you no longer need the ring to set the > aperture. The dial works > > just fine. > > It might work fine, but it's not my preference, my > preference is to > use the aperture ring, as it is on my Mamiya and > Leicas. I'm not happy > that I am being steered away from my preferential > mode of operation, > I'm allowed not to like this and I don't see why I > shouldn't be able > to say so. I don't view the way that things have > progressed as good or > advantageous to me because they simply aren't. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
