I now own two 2.74mp cameras, a 4, 6, and 10 mp camera.

I like the results of the 2.74 ones the best so far.

Just an observation.

Dave

Quoting Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> I guess you're saying all those existing DSLR's with a bigger pixel count
> don't produce equal if not better images???  I suppose when Pentax releases
> higher MP DSLR's your argument will no longer be valid?
>
> Everyone start hunkering down in the bunkers.  I can see another Pentax
> jihad starting. :-)
>
>
> Tom C.
>
> "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or
> numbered."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: K110D - Why bother?
>> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:56:00 -0400
>>
>> Who cares about the number of megapixels?  As many have pointed out, a
>> higher pixel count in the same physical space often yields more noise -- so
>> who cares if there are more pixels if the printed image quality suffers?
>>
>> Oh, sure, advertising buzzwords, etc etc.  Would you rather have a better
>> picture or a bigger number?
>>
>> -Aaron
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> From:  "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subj:  Re: K110D - Why bother?
>> Date:  Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:18 pm
>> Size:  2K
>> To:  [email protected]
>>
>> Your last interrogative (Why not sell it?) was more or less where I was
>> coming from.  Will it sell *that* well? I'm not doubting the results from a
>> 6MP camera obviously as that's what we have at the moment.
>>
>> As you correctly stated, the marketing bar is raised. Currently Nikon and
>> Pentax are the only mfrs. actively selling a 6MP DSLR.  To have engineered
>> and fabricated a *new* 6MP DSLR, when by all accounts 6MP is for the most
>> part (from my perception) considered passe, seems kind of foolish.
>>
>> As a casual shopper with no brand allegiance and not worrying about money,
>> it would instantly jump out at me that Canon sells 8 & 12 MP cameras, while
>> Pentax is selling 6 and 10MP cameras.
>>
>> I'm not trying to start an argument, just stating my opinion that quite
>> soon, if not already, new 6MP DSLR's will be viewed as a low-end beginner's
>> camera, regardless of picture quality. Perception is often everything in
>> the
>> marketplace.
>>
>>
>> Tom C.
>>
>> "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or
>> numbered."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> >Subject: Re: K110D - Why bother?
>> >Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:37:03 -0700
>> >
>> >On Aug 10, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Tom C wrote:
>> >
>> > > I was questioning the wisdom of continuing with any 6MP DSLR body
>> > > when the
>> > > bar has been raised in entry level DSLRs for some time now.
>> >
>> >Which bar? Just because 8 and 10 Mpixel cameras are out there at
>> >similar pricing doesn't mean that they do any better on image
>> >quality. The entry-level DSLR market generally isn't concerned with
>> >making a 13x19 and larger presentation prints, the difference in
>> >ultimate resolution is barely noticeable at 8x12 and 11x17 inch print
>> >sizes.
>> >
>> >Perhaps you mean the marketing bar.
>> >
>> >Regardless, the Pentax 6Mpixel SLRs return superb results. I'm
>> >finishing up another exhibit's batch of 11x14s right now and the
>> >quality is delightful. As long as the sensor is available, it's
>> >proven technology that will make excellent photographs. As time goes
>> >on, they'll be available for lower and lower prices. Why kill a good
>> >thing?
>> >
>> >Far as I can tell from reports, the K110D is an advance on the DL
>> >models in having faster AF, improved JPEG rendering out of the
>> >camera, and commonality of parts with the K100D. Why not sell it?
>> >
>> >Godfrey
>> >
>> >--
>> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> >[email protected]
>> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>



Equine Photography in York Region

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to