Mike Hamilton wrote: > What is the purpose of a weather sealed body without any sealed > lenses? I imagine that the two upcoming lenses (16-50/2.8 being one) > will be weather sealed. If so, that's going to be an expensive lens, > given the super-sonic motor and fast aperture... Perhaps Pentax's > most expensive zoom? Pentax has typically produced high priced primes > (A* and FA*, FA Limiteds), but not really the expensive zooms (barr > the 24-90 and a couple of FA* zooms). > > Is my reasoning correct? > > Mike > -- > Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca >
Dust reduction, for one. And it protects the body, even if it does leave a single entry-point for dust and water (the mount). The LX is dust sealed, so this isn't exactly new. -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
