Shel. I partly agree with the first sentence. Some kind of warning would have been proper. But by using the term c***d p**n you may have attracted attention from people searching that term. And I totally disagree about using that term about this picture.
Second sentence made me upset, really upset. Last sentence: No comment. Most likely you are not able to understand why I react the way I do. I am not, and I repeat _not_, implying anything about your intelligence or integrity. I think you can't understand simply because of cultural differences. I can live with that. People have different ethics. But please don't throw your ethics in our face, pretending they are the only valid ethics. I know you know better Shel. This said. You are off course in your full right telling us that you dislike the photo. Please don't respond to this _on list_. I just had to get this off my chest. _My_ ethics prevents me from starting a public debate, but they also tells me to tell you how much I disagree ;-) With anger and respect ;-) Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff Sent: 9. september 2006 01:15 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: PESO: My grand daughtrer and the 77mm Limited You should post this pic with a "child porn" alert. Disgusting the things some people post to a public forum. I have alerted the proper authorities. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Jens Bladt > Isn't she lovely? > Take a look: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/236620723/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
