Well, sometimes it is simply a matter of the specs not being fully 
finalized. You guys can not imagine the flack a manufacture can get if 
the final specs do not match the announced specs. OTH, the type of thing 
we seem to have here is just a way of building hype.

I am not in the market, the only reason I was able to spend $200 on the 
Oly was because I got my deposit back from the electric company, and a 
nice overpayment check from the budget plan too. That was year before 
this, this year a merely got $15, and suspect I will owe them money next 
year. Bushenomics in action.

-- 
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------


Tom C wrote:
> You know... that's the only conclusion I can reach as well... LOL.
> 
> 
> 
> Tom C.
> 
> 
>> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: K10D Competitors and Press Release
>> Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
>>
>> Maybe they're afraid that Canon and Nikon will quickly retool and beat
>> the Pentax technology to the market place?  ;-)))
>>
>> Jack
>>
>> --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe if Pentax released enough details about the camera - to the
>>> public -
>>> before it goes on sale to the public, they would generate demand.
>>> Why
>>> should it be a hush hush secret? That would be a ridiculous approach.
>>>  What
>>> would be lost? It's not some stealth corporate hi-tech espionage
>>> affair.
>>>
>>> How can you, a private individual and customer, "get in trouble" from
>>> a
>>> corporation that holds no authority over you? If Pentax Japan did not
>>> want
>>> anybody to know then they should not have told anybody.  What is
>>> gained by
>>> telling dealers who are forbidden to tell the customer?
>>>
>>> The whole thing is preposterous.
>>>
>>>
>>> Tom C.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> From: John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: K10D Competitors and Press Release
>>>> Date: Fri,  8 Sep 2006 12:05:35 -0700
>>>>
>>>>> As for the supposed press release, if it is real will
>>>>> someone just post the whole thing already? It makes no
>>>>> sense to post just bits and pieces. If you are really
>>>>> leaking confidential information, just go the whole
>>>>> way and leak ALL of it :-)...
>>>> Remember when I posted a bunch of new info about the camera that I
>>> got from
>>>> my
>>>> Pentax rep?  Well, Pentax's engineers in Japan found my e-mail
>>> through
>>>> Google
>>>> and I got in trouble for it (I hadn't been told about the
>>> non-disclosure
>>>> agreement my store signed, so I got off easy).
>>>>
>>>> I wish I could tell everything I know about the camera, but I don't
>>> want to
>>>> get
>>>> in trouble again, and I'm sure that's how other people with
>>> privileged
>>>> knowledge feel about the situation.  It's already frustrating
>>> enough;
>>>> please
>>>> don't make it worse by begging.
>>>>
>>>> The official press release will happen soon enough.  Just be patient
>>> and
>>>> you'll
>>>> hear it all straight from the horse's mouth.
>>>>
>>>> John Celio
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 
> 
> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to