> 
> From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/09/07 Thu AM 01:00:35 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: APS-C sensor $34?!
> 
> Those still holding out for a FF Pentax please note.
> 
> John

So, because one component (probably the most expensive) costs 10x more (plus 
associated costs) the whole unit is twice the price.  Seems like a bargain to 
me.  Pentax can knock the DL/2 out (with two lenses) for £500.  Give me that 
with FF and you can throw the mechanical actuator in as well.  I'll pay £1500.  
The LX, body only, got to more than that in the UK.

> 
> On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 01:46:41 +0100, K.Takeshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
> wrote:
> 
> > Much info is available on the sensor cost, and this is one of them. At  
> > least
> > the authour, who claimed to have worked in the semicon industry for  
> > years,
> > is fairly definitive.  But he is referring to 200mm wafer which is a bit
> > outdated.  It must be at least 300mm now.  The article is dated Sept 2006
> > though.
> > Anyway, FF sensor cost is interesting
> >
> > http://www.naturescapes.net/092006/ej0906.htm
> >
> > Ken
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software 
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to