Scott, I used to carry the 20-70/4 but I felt the 70mm end too short. So I bought the newest 28-105 (3.2-4.5) since it was almost equal in size and weight than the 28-70 and had good reviews.
My experience with this lens has been very positive. It is a great compromise between image quality and zoom range...at least in 35mm. The perfect travel lens. With the 1.5x crop factor, the lens becomes a 42-157, which isn't that useful IMHO. Ah, also I conducted a test between the 28-70 and the 28-105, and the latter proved to be sharper in all the range. My unit is in very good condition, and I am not sure about its future since I am not using it with the Ds and I don't see a full frame in the near future. Regards, Jaume --- Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Howdy, gang! > > Over the past few days there have been quite a few > references to the > "28-105". Would anyone having experience with these > lenses care to > opine about image quality, build quality, etc. As > best I can tell > (you gotta love Boz) there were three FA lenses in > this focal length: > the 3.2-4.5, the 4-5.6 power zoom, and the 4-5.6 IF. > Comments on any > and all would be welcome. > > Thanks! > > -- > Scott Loveless > http://www.twosixteen.com > Shoot more film! > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ______________________________________________ LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
