Hello Matt,

Certainly when shooting sports in poor light, you need all the speed
you can get.  I personally would stick with the Pentax A 70-210.  You
have a constant f4 at all focal lengths.  More than likely you will be
using the long end of the zoom - the other choices you mentioned will
also be f4 at those lengths.  One thing to be concerned with is wide
open performance of the lens.  Before getting mine, I did a test drive
of Godfrey's and specifically tested that performance.  Here is a
sample at f4:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/Galleries/NorCalSJ/bkd_1305.htm
All but the first cactus shots are done with the A 70-210/4 - shooting
info at the bottom.

One thing to be aware of is the Pentax is a one touch zoom.  That
means that you can focus and zoom at the same time.  For sports that
could be quicker for you.  Some people don't like it because you can
shift your focus off while zooming.  I rather like it and my college
daughter loves it.  That is her favorite lens - I ended up getting her
one.

-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Monday, September 4, 2006, 6:34:28 PM, you wrote:

MK> Thanks for the response.

MK> So, even taking into consideration the inteded usage (sports in 
MK> relatively bad lighting), the slower 50-200mm is what you think I should
MK> get? 

MK> Looking at the pricing of the 50-200 it is probably out of my budget a
MK> the moment.  Being back to school means I can't work many hours.  I'd be
MK> happy with manual focus, though the option of autofocus would be nice.
MK> Can you be more specific on how the Cosina lens compares perfomance wise
MK> to other lenses, considerign it can be had for around 50.00.  I'm 
MK> thinking that it will serve the purpose for now until I can geta few
MK> hundred dollars to spend on better glass.

MK> Thanks again,
MK> Matt




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to