The shot, as it's presented, seems to be open to a lot of possibilities compositionally. I like what the photographer chose in that it appears evenly balanced vertically. I agree that the bottom third could be cropped, but does he have more sky to play with? If not, then losing the bottom third may be a mistake. As far as left or right go, I enjoy seeing things in the middle sometimes.
-Brendan --- Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a question about composition. I came across > the following photo > (not mine): > > http://www.zyeuter.com/bon_baiser_de_valensole/photo107872.html > > There is much about it that I like, but I think that > the bottom third is > a mistake. It seems to me that the photographer > should have cut off the > bottom third, then extended the composition somewhat > to the right (if > possible--maybe there's a cement plant there), > placing the building at > the upper-left "golden rectangle" point. > > What do others think? Is there justification for > keeping the lower third? > > Joe > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
