Nope, I haven't but this is SOP for most manufactures these days. Why would I assume that Pentax is any different.
Paul Stenquist wrote: >You've been to board meetings and you're sure that is their intent? >On Aug 31, 2006, at 10:14 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: > > > >>Pentax doesn't warehouse much in the way of product anymore. They >>build >>to fill orders. When they can no longer recover costs they'll stop >>making them and sell out what little is left and take the loss as a >>tax >>write off. >> >>keith_w wrote: >> >> >> >>>John Forbes wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>There won't be massive price cuts because the margins aren't >>>>there to >>>>permit massive price cuts. >>>> >>>>Pentax will sell 6mp bodies for as long as people want to buy >>>>them. Once >>>>the price people are willing to pay drops below the price at >>>>which Pentax >>>>can turn a profit, they will stop selling them. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>And then what? Throw 'em in the trash? >>> >>>keith whaley >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>This is simple economics. It applies to all companies, in all >>>>market >>>>economies. >>>> >>>>John >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>-- >>Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler. >> >> --Albert Einstein >> >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> > > > > -- Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler. --Albert Einstein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
