Thanks all. There seems to be a consensus. That was what I thought when I first saw it. It was taken with a 35mm lens, but for me it really needed to be 28mm or wider, with me a lot closer to the young girl. I would also have liked some sunlight on the grass.
-- Cheers, Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Tom C > Sent: 31 August 2006 00:53 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Kite > > IMHO, you are being sentimental. I believe the main subject > of the picture > is just too small, if the the child is the subject, and the secondary > subject (kite) is too small as well. > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > > >From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]> > >Subject: Kite > >Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:33:53 +0100 > > > >Hi, > > > >I can't remember whether I've shown this before or not. > >http://www.web-options.com/Kite.jpg > > > >It's a couple of years old, and I was disappointed with it because I > >felt at the time that I hadn't got what I wanted. But revisiting it > >(accidentally, while browsing my hard disk), I rather like the space > >and the freedom but perhaps I'm letting my sentiment cloud my > >judgement. I'd be interested to hear what others think. > > > >Cheers, > >Bob > > > > > > > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >[email protected] > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
