Thibouille wrote: > Yeah I understand it is annoying (to say the least). > On my part I always try to stay on subject but maybe it is only > wishful thinking I dunno. > > Anyway I agree with you on that point !
Anyone, who has been on list as long as Keith, knows perfectly well that any thread that has gone past about 20 posts is almost certainly either split or off topic. He has only himself to blame. Insert <vbg> if you must.... > > 2006/8/24, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>The archives are accessible .... >> >>Shel >> >> >> >> >>>[Original Message] >>>From: keith_w >> >>>Ya know, I've thrown away a *ton* of "CF v SD Cards" messages, because I >>>foolishly thought we were still talking about memory cards. I don't >> >>currently >> >>>have any interest at all in memory cards, so I tossed 'em out! >>> >>>It really would be nice if somebody would change the Subject line a >> >>little >> >>>more often, because I do enjoy reading about lens tests, new camera >> >>offerings, >> >>>and all the other numerous topics that invariably creep in... >>> >>>I'll bet I missed a *lot* of informative messages that would have been >> >>very >> >>>interesting. >>> >>>I know. My fault... >>> >>>keith whaley >>> >>>Shel Belinkoff wrote: >>> >>>>FWIW, I've been real pleased with the performance of the A50/1.4 on the >>>>istDS, and would probably feel the same for the FA version as well. A >>>>75mm/1.4 - so to speak - is very nice. Leica offered a 75/1.4 for the >>>>Leica M - very spendy! I traded an old ME Super for the A lens. I >> >>think I >> >>>>got the better deal. >>>> >>>>However, Like Rob, I do think some of the newer DA lenses are over >> >>rated, >> >>>>at least the few that I tried. I'm not saying they're crap, but they >> >>were >> >>>>a little disappointing based on comments I read here and elsewhere. I >>>>think my feelings about the 16-45 have been noted more than once. I did >>>>like the 14/2.8 that I tried, although I didn't have a chance to really >> >>put >> >>>>it through its paces and use it as much as the 16-45. I'd love to try >> >>the >> >>>>12-24 and the new 21mm. >>>> >>>>Shel >>> >>> >>>>>[Original Message] >>>>>From: Paul Stenquist >>>> >>>>>To add to this, I would bet you'll be seeing some very good DA primes >>>>>down the road. I wouldn't be surprised to see something like a >>>>>10/3.5. There's been plenty of research in lenses of that ilk for >>>>>35mm movie cameras, so it's not brain surgery. And Pentax hasn't >>>>>forgotten how to make glass. >>> >>> >>>-- >>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>[email protected] >>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
