You never know! ;-)

Tom C.

>
>So you're saying if you both shut up, then the list will be naturally
>balanced?
>
>--
>Bruce
>
>
>Wednesday, August 23, 2006, 10:54:52 AM, you wrote:
>
>TC> Funny... I attack Pentax to maintain list equilibrium. :-)
>
>
>
>TC> Tom C.
>
> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >>Subject: Re: venting about lack of available 3rd party & other lense
> >>Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:52:09 +0000
> >>
> >>Same guy. I'll debate you when I think you're attacking Pentax unfairly.
> >>But that's just to help maintain list equilibrium. If I'm a fan of any
> >>camera, I guess it would be Leica thread mounts, but I'm a user for the
> >>most part. I've owned and used two Nikons, five Mamiyas, two Leicas, one
> >>Speed Graphic, one Minolta, one Canon and  two Fujis in addition to ten 
>or
> >>so Pentax. I blame list enablement for the large number of Pentax 
>tools:-).
> >>Paul
> >>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> >>From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > Are you the same Paul or have you been body-snatched by alien space
> >>pods?
> >> > :-)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Tom C.
> >> >
> >> > "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or
> >> > numbered."
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >> > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >> > >Subject: Re: venting about lack of available 3rd party & other lense
> >> > >Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:09:42 +0000
> >> > >
> >> > >Cameras are only tools. I'm not a fan or an advocate of any brand. 
>I've
> >> > >used most of them at one time or another.
> >> > >Paul
> >> > >  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> >> > >From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > > > That borders on heresy coming from you, Paul. :-)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I've actually heard lots of good things about the D200.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Tom C.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, 
>debriefed
> >>or
> >> > > > numbered."
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > >From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > > > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >> > > > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >> > > > >Subject: Re: venting about lack of available 3rd party & other
> >>lense
> >> > > > >Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:48:32 -0400
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >The Pentax K10, which is due next month, looks to be very 
>similar
> >>to
> >> > > > >the Nikon D200. Perhaps better if Aaron's secret feature amounts 
>to
> >> > > > >something. In any case, If I were to jump, it certainly wouldn't 
>be
> >> > > > >to Nikon. The only viable alternative I see is Canon.
> >> > > > >Paul
> >> > > > >On Aug 22, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Amita Guha wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > On 8/21/06, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> Amita,
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> Jump when in-body shake reduction is becoming
> >> > > > > >> available in a weather-sealed body?  For Canon's
> >> > > > > >> overpriced and underperforming glass, or third-party
> >> > > > > >> glass?
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> You've gotta be kidding.
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> Rick
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > No, I'm not kidding. The specs on the K100 series don't 
>impress
> >>me,
> >> > > > > > nor do the latest batch of Pentax lenses. I'm going to keep 
>my
> >>best
> >> > > > > > Pentax lenses and the *istD, so If Pentax decides to someday 
>put
> >>out
> >> > >a
> >> > > > > > body that is worth my money, I will snap it up in a 
>heartbeat.
> >>The
> >> > >3rd
> >> > > > > > party glass thing is just a symptom of a larger problem. 
>Bottom
> >>line
> >> > > > > > is that I'm sick of waiting for Pentax to put out products 
>that
> >>I
> >> > > > > > actually want. I still love my existing glass, but I think 
>three
> >> > >years
> >> > > > > > is long enough to wait for a new body.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > In the meantime, I have my eye on the Nikon D200. I'm going 
>to
> >>go
> >> > >look
> >> > > > > > at one this weekend. I'm not certain I'm going to go to 
>Nikon,
> >> > >because
> >> > > > > > I want to wait for the camera shows, but I'm hoping to start 
>a
> >>new
> >> > > > > > system by the end of the year. I spent last weekend 
>researching
> >> > >lenses
> >> > > > > > for both Canon and Nikon and I'm satisfied that I can get 
>what I
> >> > >need
> >> > > > > > for either system, although I will certainly miss my Ltd 
>glass.
> >>:)
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Cotty, Nate thinks that the 20D would be almost a step 
>sideways
> >>from
> >> > > > > > the *istD, although if I decide to go with Canon, I'll 
>probably
> >> > >start
> >> > > > > > with the 20D and go from there.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Amita
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> > > > > > [email protected]
> >> > > > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >--
> >> > > > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> > > > >[email protected]
> >> > > > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> > > > [email protected]
> >> > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >--
> >> > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> > >[email protected]
> >> > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>[email protected]
> >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to