> Just guess it. Some of us has. > Otherwise the game will not end before the specifications of the K10D are > finally revealed by Pentax. > I thought it was quite entertaining and fun - one of the best threads in a > long time. So many creative answers! > Afterall, ir's not that many features that will make a digital camera > compeditive with Medium Format - besides resolution, that is. > Stop thinking gizmos, gadgets, whistles and bells - think image quality. > I really can't think of anything that might be improved besides the dynamic range. But I'm having a hard time seeing how they might make that better, especially if they are using a well-known APS-C-sized sensor and/or haven't reduced the sensor noise - and so do most other people, that's actually what a large portion of the thread is about.
Unless, that is, they have managed to make a mode where you might read (and reset) the sensor multiple times during a long exposure, and add up the data in the end. I'm assuming, of course, that they haven't just stuck in a A/D converter with a higher number of bits, as that would actually do nothing whatsoever to improve the usable range (but might perhaps help sell a few cameras to clueless people...) - Toralf -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
