D'oh, I'm apparently receiving posts out of order.  After sending this
"please explain" to Ryan, THEN I find his references in my inbox.  No wonder
his response seemed a little sharp.

Sorry Ryan, I'll go and get my explanations from those links now.

Regards,
Anthony Farr

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Anthony Farr
> Sent: Saturday, 19 August 2006 1:22 AM
> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> Subject: RE: Tonal gradation in shadows - The $67 Question?
> 
> Not at all.  In fact I don't know the working of an a/d converter beyond
> that they take a stream of voltage readouts from the sensor and perform
some
> voodoo ceremony upon it, whereupon the voltage levels at each photosite
are
> assigned brightness levels of 0 - 255 for 8 bit files, or 0 - 4095 for 12
> bit files.  That's the sum of my understanding of the subject.
> 
> If someone who seems to be an expert makes an assertion without an
> explanation I can: (a) totally and naively trust their opinion; or (b) ask
> for some explanation.  Option (a) has let me down in the past, so I choose
> (b).
> 
> So my question is; when the a/d converter assigns arbitrary brightness
> levels to voltage levels, why can't they be assigned on a logarithmic
scale
> rather than a linear scale?  Can't it have a lookup table to adapt the
> numbers, or even just recalculate them on-the-fly?
> 
> Hint - the correct answer is not "because it's not done that way" or
> "because it won't work".
> 
> Regards,
> Anthony Farr
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Ryan
> > Brooks
> > Sent: Saturday, 19 August 2006 12:32 AM
> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Subject: Re: Tonal gradation in shadows - The $67 Question?
> >
> > Anthony Farr wrote:
> > > Oh.  I see.  Why?
> > >
> > Because, you've obviously figure out something that electrical engineers
> > and physicists have missed for 20 years.  Congrats!
> >
> > -Ryan
> >


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to