Digital Module R, Mamiya ZD already have that (As do pretty much all MF backs).
-Adam Patrick Genovese wrote: > How about true 16 bit output ? > > On 8/17/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Jens, >> >>If it was merely resolution, why the heck would Aaron be looking at the >>K10D instead of a higher-resolution body from Nikon or Canon (Or a >>Hasselblad or other MF body with a digiback). >> >>Aaron specifically said it was something _no_ other DSLR offered yet. >>And between the D2x, 5D, 1Ds mkII and Mamiya ZD, there are plenty of >>options which handily outperform the upcoming K10D for resolution. And >>there are 3 other cameras on the market (or will be before the K10D) >>which match the K10D for resolution (A100, D80 and Digital Module R). >> >>And also its something he can't talk about, the resolution of the K10D >>was practically the first thing we knew about it. >> >>-Adam >> >> >> >>Jens Bladt wrote: >> >>>Come on folks - it's not that hard. What makes the 67 superior to almost ANY >>>digital camera - except for resolution? >>>The K10D closes this gap. >>>And - yes - I believe I did guess Aarons secret. >>>Jens >>> >>>Jens Bladt >>>http://www.jensbladt.dk >>>+45 56 63 77 11 >>>+45 23 43 85 77 >>>Skype: jensbladt248 >>> >>>-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >>>Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af John >>>Francis >>>Sendt: 17. august 2006 18:15 >>>Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>Emne: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body >>> >>> >>>On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:31:35PM +0100, Richard Day wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Raw rules! >>>> >>>>But in addition to PEF (if they insist on keeping it), please implement >>>>compressed DNG properly with full sized embedded JPEG "in-camera" as an >>>>option. >>> >>> >>>PEF, of course, already includes a full sized embedded JPEG "in-camera". >>>Unfortunately it's done at the lowest JPEG quality, so it's not useful >>>for much more than the preview (in-camera on the LCD, and also in the >>>Pentax Photo Browser) for which it was presumably included. >>> >>>I've long wanted control over the quality of that JPEG - if I'm shooting >>>raw I'm not going to complain about the difference between a 3MB JPEG >>>that's quite usable for many purposes and a 1.5MB JPEG of no use to me. >>> >>> >>>-- >>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>[email protected] >>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>>-- >>>No virus found in this incoming message. >>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.1/421 - Release Date: 08/16/2006 >>> >>>-- >>>No virus found in this outgoing message. >>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.1/421 - Release Date: 08/16/2006 >>> >>> >> >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
