Some of us rarely get that slow. I use 100 on occasion, but push Tri-X as far as 6400 on a regular basis. My DSLR is almost permanently set to 800.
-Adam Jack Davis wrote: > I've not used a film faster than 100 ISO, since doing my last wedding > in 1993. Used 200 for in-home reception. MF Provia 100F for church. > > Jack > > > --- graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Well, my little digicam goes down to 64 (smaller sensor >>elements=lower >>ISO range), which is what I use most of the time. Of course it only >>goes >>up to 400, but combined with the f/1.8 lenses that works OK. High ISO >> >>and slow lenses have aways bothered me; although I admit it is >>cheaper >>to build them that way. >> >>I would gladly trade 200 pages of "features" for decent, easy to use, >> >>manual focus on the thing though. >> >>-- >>graywolf >>http://www.graywolfphoto.com >>http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf >>"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" >>----------------------------------- >> >> >>Jack Davis wrote: >> >>>There has, obvious, been a cascade of posts relative to the >> >>upcoming >> >>>K10D. I read a sample here and there and actually followed a couple >>>specific subject speculations for awhile. >>>Don't know how it could have not received it's share speculation, >> >>but >> >>>if so, I missed it. >>>Anyone guessing about the sensitivity range? Specifically, the >> >>lower >> >>>end. 100 iso? 50? >>> >>> >>>Jack >>> >>> >>>__________________________________________________ >>>Do You Yahoo!? >>>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>>http://mail.yahoo.com >>> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
