If Aaron is willing to sell his 67 gear, then i suspect the new camera news he dangles to us, is, a nice wooden handle for the K10d.:-)
Combine SR and a nice wood handle, you have the pur-fect camera. :-) Dave Quoting Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I rarely shoot with a tripod -- in fact, I no longer own one. > > -Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subj: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body > Date: Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:46 am > Size: 2K > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > > To change from 67 would imply improved resolution and detail ... If > shooting tripod mounted and with the mirror locked up it might be > possible to use the SR system move the sensor a small amount between > exposures then combine exposures using an interpolation algorithm > to improve the resolution? Similarly, combining multiple exposures > to improve the dynamic range in camera (a bit like HDR imaging). > > Dave > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, 14 August, 2006 12:08:00 PM > Subject: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body > > > No... mostly I shoot colour neg and make really nice scans on my > Sprintscan 120. > > -Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Lucas Rijnders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subj: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body > Date: Mon Aug 14, 2006 5:12 am > Size: 1K > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 03:01:20 +0200, Aaron Reynolds > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I have just learned something about it that pretty much seals the deal >> -- I'll be buying it if I have to sell a kidney to do it. It addresses >> my most basic complaint about digital. It's a feature that's so much >> of a no-brainer, and yet as far as I know not a single DSLR out there >> at any price, including ones using the same sensor, have it. >> >> And unless I've missed some posts, no one has even speculated about it >> here. Or even said "gee, I wish it could do this". >> >> Brothers, I kid you not -- I may be selling my 67. Naturally, I have >> to see it in action to see if it matches up to what the advantage >> should be in theory. But if it does... holy crap. >> >> Mid-September we're going to be seeing some forehead-slapping amongst >> the competition in the DSLR world. >> >> Unless, of course, I've been fed a complete load of manure. Which is >> entirely possible. > > Hi Aaron, > > Brilliant post :o) My first guess was ISO as accessible as shutter and > aperture as an exposure control. However, you heavily hint at vastly > improved image quality, archieveable with the same sensor. So I'll just > ask: > > Do you shoot a lot of B&W in the 67? > > -- > Regards, Lucas > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > Equine Photography in York Region -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
