I think that's if you call compare your opponent Hitler or a Nazi in a
flame war. Describing his behavior probably doesn't count, unless you
attribute it to your opponent.
William Robb wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Subject: RE: Another Blow Against Photography
>
>
>
>
>>Utter nonsense. Blaming radical behavior on poverty and bad conditions
>>is the old liberal excuse for everyone who can't behave. It no longer
>>holds water. Never has. Is that why Hitler wanted to kill the jews?
>>Radical Islam has a fundamental problem with everyone else in the
>>world. That makes them a problem. It has nothing to do with
>>conditions. We tried the liberal cure in many places: Give them a lot
>>of money and better living conditions and everything will be okay.
>>Never has worked. Won't work now.
>>
>>
>
>Isn't there some sort of rule that when Hitler gets mentioned, the
>arguement is over, the battle lost?
>
>William Robb
>
>
>
>
>
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
