Intriguing. I await more information ... ;-) Godfrey
On Aug 13, 2006, at 6:01 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote: > I have just learned something about it that pretty much seals the deal > -- I'll be buying it if I have to sell a kidney to do it. It > addresses > my most basic complaint about digital. It's a feature that's so much > of a no-brainer, and yet as far as I know not a single DSLR out there > at any price, including ones using the same sensor, have it. > > And unless I've missed some posts, no one has even speculated about it > here. Or even said "gee, I wish it could do this". > > Brothers, I kid you not -- I may be selling my 67. Naturally, I have > to see it in action to see if it matches up to what the advantage > should be in theory. But if it does... holy crap. > > Mid-September we're going to be seeing some forehead-slapping amongst > the competition in the DSLR world. > > Unless, of course, I've been fed a complete load of manure. Which is > entirely possible. > > -Aaron > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
