I wondered why Pentax even thought announcing another 6MP DSLR was somehow a 
good marketing strategy.


Tom C.

"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or 
numbered."







>From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>To: "PDML" <[email protected]>
>Subject: K110D - Why bother?
>Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:12:37 -0700
>
>A friend is looking for an entry level DSLR, and she likes my istDS.  We
>talked a little about the DL/DL2 and the new (and now available) K110D and
>the K100D.  Price is a concern for her, so the non-anti-shake body is where
>here interest lies.  BuyDig has both the DL and the K110D in stock, and, of
>course, the DL is quite a bit less expensive than the K110D.
>
>I don't see much difference between the DL and the K110D.  Are there any
>features that the K110D that the DL doesn't?  I can't find any of
>significance.  However, my friend is relying on me to help her make the
>decision ... any thoughts on the comparison between the two cameras?
>
>
>Shel
>
>
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to