On the DS, if you go to about 4x-5x magnification, you're seeing the pixels at approximately 1:1 and can evaluate sharpness easily.
I agree that you can't see sharpness well enough at standard review size without magnification. G On Aug 4, 2006, at 1:33 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: > From my experience, I've taken shots that I was sure I'd missed the > focus on, and reviewed them on the rear screen of my *ist-Ds, not > as big > as the new K series but close, and breathed a sigh of relief thinking > they were salvageable. They weren't. Everything looks sharp at that > resolution, if you get the focus even close. It's not the size of the > screen, it's the pixels displayed that tells the story. > > Tom C wrote: > >> Not making a major issue of it, but the screen is a good 5 times >> the size of >> the viewfinder, plus one can zoom in on the part of the image they >> wish to >> inspect... I can see it being useful (though I would easily have >> traded 2 >> more megapixels for the feature). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
