Shel, Are you trying to imply some relationship between the poster with the gag and the man? The poster makes the original artist's statement (whatever that may be). The asian guy looking on is a derivative figure trying to add something to that statement. It would be stronger for me if I thought he was actually looking at the poster's content, not just around a corner wonder what's on the other side. I don't see him as actually reacting to the main visual. Regards, Bob S.
On 7/17/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, Frank, apparently, according to some people, if the intent or meaning > isn't spelled out for them, it is a "bad thing." > > It's interesting how the flower and landscape set see this and how those, > on a couple of other venues, who work more with documentary and in other > areas of photography, see it. Oh well .... > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: frank theriault > > > On 7/17/06, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/demo.html > > > > See no evil, speak no evil. You're missing the third element of the > > trilogy. <g> > > > > It's interesting, Shel. I'm not sure whether the man on the left is a > > figure of authority, refusing to acknowledge the woman who's being > > gagged, or if he's one of the oppressed. > > > > Either way, it's a photo that makes me think, so that can't be a bad > thing. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
