Actually the difference between Painting and Photography is that
Painters can have long detailed discussions without once mentioning
paintbrushes, canvas or brush strokes.
frank theriault wrote:
>On 7/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>In a message dated 7/13/2006 9:18:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>So the
>>limit between painting and photography is not really too clear.
>>Regards
>>
>>Jens Bladt
>>=======
>>Definitely. Agreed. Big time.
>>
>>
>
>Nope. Gotta agree with Bob on this one. The difference between
>photography and painting is quite clear. Photography (in this sense)
>is an image derived from the momentary capture of light on an
>electronic or chemical sensor. Painting is the application of
>chemical substance on a surface. The fact that the results can
>sometimes look somewhat similar in no way makes the processes
>analogous.
>
>It kind of reminds me of the difference between sending a television
>image from one place to another, as opposed to teleporting that same
>object. Like in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Or Star Trek.
>They're two different concepts entirely, and can't be confused
>(although Willie Wonka confused them).
>
>cheers,
>frank
>
>
>
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
