Adam, You're still talking nonsense. If these freight aircraft can carry 78 tons, then charging $1,000 per pound would yield gross revenue of $156 million per flight.
Strange that most of the American airline industry is in Chapter 11 when there is so much money to be earned shipping cameras. Now take a deep breath and come back down to earth. John On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 20:15:40 +0100, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Forbes wrote: > >> Aaron, >> >> When you're in a hole, stop digging. >> >> And put your brain in gear. >> >> As Don points out, large quantities would result in lower prices, not >> higher ones. >> >> I suspect whoever posted this meant $1,000/ton, not per pound. And LESS >> for larger quantities. If larger quantities cost more, people would >> just >> ship consignments of one, wouldn't they? >> >> Work it out for yourself. >> >> John >> >> >> >> > After a certain point, it gets more expensive, not less. Which is why we > use container ships rather than sending 40 ton containers by air freight. > > > -Adam > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
