On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Toralf Lund wrote: > William Robb wrote: >> Negative film gives the lab about a stop of underexposure and about 3 stops >> of over exposure before a good print can't be pulled from it, a jpeg has >> about half that latitude. > Doesn't this mean that what we ought to keep in mind is > > It is better to overexpose than underexpose > > for digital *and negative film*? (But maybe some of you have been > thinking that way all along?)
That's correct, I rate Superia 400 at 320; others go even further than that. Kostas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
