> BTW: I had always understood the FA 70-200 to be a dog. > Detail in the shirt, arm, hat and guitar is excellent. > So much for that theory! > > Don
I thought it was the F 80-200 that was the dog.??? Oh well.:-) I used this 70-200 instead of the 50-200. I looked through some shots taken in May with the 50-200 and some were nice and sharp and contrasty, and others were not. Proabaly because of me, but i thought the 70-200 might give more consistant results. Have not really looked at to many to assess, i used that pef2jpg program to get some jpgs to a slide show for the family, but they tend to be on the flat side. Program is fast and worth while if you just want something for a quick view and slide show. The ones i'v looked at in Raw PS seem to have nice colours. Thnaks for the kind words Don Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:12 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Paw > > > > > > One from the weekend. > > > > istD with FA70-200 and shot in Raw. Converted in PSCS to B&W > > R=80,G=20,B=5. Constant-2. > > Some S/H but only a tweak. > > > > This is the front four of Nuraw Blooze. Guest singer is the guy > > to the right of the guitar > > player. > > > > > > > > http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/four.jpg > > > > Not as contrasty as i wanted, but nice enough i think > > > > Dave > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
