Very nice, and I think Bruce is right. The sharp image next to the unsharp rock gives the illusion of being too sharp. Regards, Bob S.
On 6/30/06, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, it is very nice. I'm thinking that the heavily blurred > background next to the sharp otter is making you think it is overly > sharp. Nice work there! > > -- > Bruce > > > Friday, June 30, 2006, 6:35:56 PM, you wrote: > > PS> Nice shot. It's just crisp and contrasty. It doesn't show > PS> oversharpening artifacts. Good work. > PS> Paul > PS> On Jun 30, 2006, at 7:59 PM, David J Brooks wrote: > > >> From the GFM weekend. > >> > >> http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/otter1.jpg > >> > >> No sharpening done, but to me looks way over sharpened for some reason. > >> > >> Nikon D200, 70-200 F2.8 VR, 1.7 Tele > >> > >> Dave > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
