Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> I don't think that anyone would argue that the tonal range of a digital
> X-ray is as good as a film X-ray -- but they're meant to be functional,
> not to be pretty.
>
> At my wife's office they still use film X-rays, but the office is
> paperless, and at the back they have a lightbox and a digital camera on
> a tripod. They photograph every X-ray and upload it into the system.
> It makes filing, organizing and displaying the X-rays much easier.
>
> The best part is not having to say "now get closer and look at this".
> They just zoom in.
>
>
Yes of course, functionality is and must be in the first place... but
that is the saying of one's mind. One's heart says something else,
sometimes ::)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], IRC:[EMAIL PROTECTED], /bin/zsh. C|N>K
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
