Shel Belinkoff wrote: >Now why in the world would you compare an f1.4 with an f2.0? That's >ludicrous. > I would compare a high-quality, sharp, high-resolution lens with another high-quality, sharp, high-resolution lens. Maximum aperture isn't everything.
Did you also think it was ludicrous to compare an f1.4 lens with an f1.9 when someone compared the FA50/1.4 to the FA43 limited I while back? > Now a Pentax 50/2.0 can be had for $10.00 Summicron 50mm >lenses have sold used more in the neighborhood of $500 - $800 depending on >the exact model and condition. > Actually, some have sold for less. It think I've seen something like $300. > OTOH, many used Pentax 50mm 1.4 lenses go >for as little as $50.00, depending on model and condition. > > But we weren't discussing "a 1.4 lens". We were discussing a certain Pentax lens that someone said were almost as good as a much more expensive Leica in terms of sharpness, resolution etc. - Toralf -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
