Aaron Reynolds wrote: > On Jun 27, 2006, at 4:29 PM, mike wilson wrote: > > >> The battery problem was common to all alkaline-powered >>cameras. With the LX, you had three choices - no battery, lithium cell >>or the remote battery pack. > > > What battery problem? The electronics were functioning just fine when > it froze up -- the batteries were nice and warm in my armpit. > > >>>Why would it be that the electronic board for one camera will be >>>available for a long time, >> >>but for another it will only be available for short time? >> >>Because one camera was made in large numbers for more than six months. > > > So the number of months that the camera was produced over is more > important than the number of cameras produced? Or what? I don't get > it. Please explain this to me in a way that makes sense. > > >>>As to LX repair frequency, it was a constant topic on my first stint >>>on the PDML. >> >>What kind of repairs were the barrage of DL complaints about? >> >>D, not DL. Mainly sensor problems and irregular battery problems IIRC. > > > What does that have to do with the longevity of the DL? I don't tell > people to beware of sticky mirror problems in the MZ-S because the LX > had them. >
Congratulations. Yawn. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
