Perhaps you have much sharper eyes than I do, or a much better monitor. The focus is perfectly satisfactory as far as I am concerned, and anyway there is much more to a photograph than focus/sharpness (ask Frank). At least, there is for me (and Frank!).
John On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:57:30 +0100, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So focus and sharpness in a photo such as this are unimportant > considerations? Or don't you see the OOF aspects of the bug? > > Shel > > > >> [Original Message] >> From: John Forbes > >> Works for me. Lovely. >> >> John >> >> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:28:55 +0100, Shel Belinkoff >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Sorry Paul, it just doesn't work. Focus is lost as you move from tail > to >> > head. Perhaps a smaller aperture and slower shutter speed might have >> > helped, maybe focusing a little more towards the middle of the >> creature > >> > ... >> > >> > Shel >> > >> > >> > >> >> [Original Message] >> >> From: Paul Stenquist >> > >> >> Two from the garden this afternoon. Both with the Sigma 500 Super and >> >> Kirk Flash Xtender >> >> >> >> *istD, A400/5/6, ISO 400 f6.7, 1/1000th: >> >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4607616&size=lg >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
