I had a week-long trip to Bulgaria recently (got back last Sunday), knew I would have some photo opportunities, but mostly a work trip. So I traveled with a very minimal kit: ist-D, DA16-45mm, DA 50-200mm, and 43 Ltd. I never used the 43, did switch back and forth between the other two with equivalent results from both.
Stan On Jun 24, 2006, at 4:16 PM, Amita Guha wrote: > I picked up this lens last week as a travel lens. It looked like the > lens was focusing poorly or something, so I returned it for a new one, > and I'm getting the same results - the images from it are very soft. > > Does anyone else have experience with this lens, and is this typical > performance for it? At this point I'm thinking of picking up the Sigma > 55-200 to see if it's any better. I realize the DA 50-200 is a cheap > lens, but I can't tolerate that level of softness. > > Thanks, > Amita > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
