On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > However, it doesn't do well when asked to render fine detail. Compared to > an A50/1.4 or a K35/2.0, the DA 16-50 does not fare well. I was > disappointed in the results it produced here > > http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/jeans/rumpledjeans_2.html > > and here > > http://home.earthlink.net/~ebay-pics/hood_3096.jpg
Hi Shel, Thanks for the detailed report. I don't have the lens/a digital so my interest is purely on the detail assessment, where I am not experienced. Would you have any comparison pictures with primes and the 16-45 in close/the same FLs? Thanks, Kostas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
